SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Longer-Term Market Trends -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AllansAlias who wrote (1208)7/2/2008 12:44:00 PM
From: Perspective  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3209
 
$RUT - This is actually the origin of that line; that slope is almost 15% (!!!!). It dates back over 20 years, the whole secular bull:



`BC



To: AllansAlias who wrote (1208)7/2/2008 6:29:37 PM
From: Perspective  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3209
 
I see the potential for a bounce here to produce another leg up in your "2/B", but I think it would require some extremely unlikely things to happen. Like the DJIA would have to get back above 11750. Otherwise, it would require nearly 15% bounce in $RUT occurring with less than 5% bounce in DJIA. That would be one heckuva divergence.

So, I favor your "blue" scenario: bounce here in a minor wave "2" before everything blows through the March lows in wave "3/C" of "3/C".

I've been trying to assemble a scenario whereby nontech blows to new lows to set a spooky "B" bottom with tech forming a double-bottom at the March lows (a variation on your other, aqua-colored count), but I keep getting caught up in the need for tech to go up an unlikely amount to complete a "C". Perhaps if nontech turned the wave "2/B" into a running correction. Regardless, it is challenging to see a correction of similar degree to the March-May eight week rally. While the market feels very oversold here an susceptible to a severe short-covering rally, I have a whole lot of respect for a) the overhead resistance and b)the trend.

As much as I'd like to cover, I suppose I'm going to just sit still. Gulp...

`BC