Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (36483)	7/2/2008 6:28:36 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218085

he was evil, for he knew what he was doing, the risks hundreds of millions, and did it,and then benefited handsomely from his hideous actions There is surely the possibility that you are correct. To counter this, I would argue that he is an old man, and money doesn't mean that much to him, he has plenty. Old men are generally more interested in how history will judge them so I don't think cold hard moolah directly to him had anything to do with what he did. I don't discount the possibility, however. I don't know. I don't like to tag anyone with the 'evil' adjective unless I am sure and I am not. If I could cross examine him, split hairs with him, confront him with his previous writings, see his reaction, smell his sweat, see his eyes, watch him twitch at the uncomfortable stuff, give him a grilling of the kind I reserve for opponents, I can assure you I'd know for sure. I'd like to see if I could make him cry.