Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (74707)	7/3/2008 6:35:02 PM
From: Cogito	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543219

>>All the requirements in the other examples are still valid. The militia one, not so much. What do you mean by that? In both the 2nd amendment and those other examples there isn't any requirement being put forth. In the others there isn't even anyone arguing that the non-active clause is making a requirement.<< Tim - Requirements was the wrong word. I'll use yours - justification. You want to argue that in the absence of the justification, the right should still pertain. I don't see how any of those examples show that to be true, since the justifications in all the other examples are still valid today. - Allen