SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Geoff Altman who wrote (33055)7/4/2008 1:10:37 AM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224757
 
As a physician,this will not be taken lightly...this hurts all doctors in the pocketbook and we're already overworked in todays' "high-volume" medicine.

No matter how you slice it, this was a self-serving vote for Specter. He should be ashamed.

Last week, Senator Arlen specter joined a minority of Senators in voting to block legislation that would have helped people on medicare maintain access to their doctors, keep premiums fair and improve benefits for the most vulnerable while boosting health care quality through national e-prescribing. The Senate vote on the medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (H.R. 6331), which passed by a bipartisan landslide in the House of Representatives, was purposely scheduled for June 26 so it would become law before the cuts to doctor payments were to go into effect on July 1.

"We are deeply troubled that Senator specter voted to block a bill with bipartisan support that would have preserved patients' access to their doctors and improved medicare for the 44 million Americans who depend on it," said Estella Hyde, AARP Pennsylvania State President. "For the sake of older Americans, people with disabilities and military families, we urge Senator specter to listen to his constituents and reconsider his vote when the bill comes up again after the congressional recess."

In addition to preventing a 10 percent cut to payments to doctors, the medicare bill would have: helped keep premiums fair; strengthened protections for lower income beneficiaries; improved medicare's coverage of preventive services, and made medicare more efficient through electronic prescribing. The Senate is currently scheduled to reconsider H.R. 6331 immediately following the July 4th recess.