SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Mullens who wrote (78295)7/4/2008 10:17:53 AM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197013
 
Hardly think “..(3G) is rapidly approaching the top of the S-Curve” with 3G subs-

…+ currently under 13% of total global subs

…+ won’t hit 50% of total for another 5 years –

…+ eventually, virtually all subs will be 3G


If Qualcomm was an operator, these would be the important metrics.

However, they are not an operator, and you are going to be in for a rather large negative surprise if you base your growth assumptions on these numbers. The important number for Qualcomm is the revenues associated with handset sales. The last time I looked, 3G handsets accounted for over half of total handset revenues...so saying that they are getting towards the top of the "S curve" is an accurate statement.

Fortunately, Q has been able to grow their market share in chips. Since they only have around a 1/3 share, there is still room for growth in this segment over the next few years....and of course, they also have the possibility of adding back in Nokia's royalties and subtracting out the huge amounts of SG&A associated with the legal battles.

Slacker



To: Jim Mullens who wrote (78295)7/4/2008 4:34:51 PM
From: qinvestor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197013
 
Hi

I'm still long QC, but I know that this story has an ending. This is still a growth story for a couple more years. We could have seen stronger earnings during these peak growth years. I think the growth in earnings are are being squandered on too many projects and Q is losing focus.

My point is that IJ was an exceptional and visionary leader who left QC with a very good future. I don't think Paul has the same capabilities.