SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ampex Corp. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ampexfan who wrote (5602)7/4/2008 11:03:16 PM
From: wvbuild 06  Respond to of 5839
 
That's what you say.....let's see what the court says.



To: ampexfan who wrote (5602)7/4/2008 11:20:45 PM
From: mamenikr  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5839
 
Did Strickland ever tell you what Dr.David Martin of M.CAM had said about Ampex's I.P. patents. Did Strickland ever say what Commercial Strategy had to say about Ampex's I.P. patents.Has Strickland ever said anything about anything since he has been ceo of Ampex. Check his background and Bramson also and see how many BK's he's been involved in.I suggest you mind your own business and move on if you don't like what i am saying.By the way i don't need any bucking up either.



To: ampexfan who wrote (5602)7/5/2008 11:09:03 AM
From: fuddled  Respond to of 5839
 
Ampexfan, no need to regurgitate the onion skin thin veil of distraction spun by Bramson and McKibben. Peel away just one layer and the facts support a much different interpretation. If you truly are an Ampex fan and not a Bramson fan, I'm sure you want the shareholders to triumph over Bramson.