Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (33341)	7/5/2008 3:33:47 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 224757

Frederick Douglass would say who in their right mind would vote for this socialist

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (33341)	7/5/2008 4:32:24 PM
From: MJ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224757

Who cares what orators a 150 years from now will say about Obama's need, that he created, to defend his patriotism? This election is about now--- not a 150 years from now. This writer is attempting to put a guilt trip on Americans. This writer, moi, is not buying that nonsense. When a candidate with the Muslim connections that Obama has is running for office, when we have been dealing with radical Muslims, Americans should ask the questions about his Muslim background. The Mormon people have been in this nation since the early settlers came------the Mormons, like the Catholics, the Jews, the various Christian churches are this nation. None of these religions consider themselves above the laws of the United States. They do not want to replace our civil law with their laws based on their religion as is now happening in England with Muslims usurping civil law. Where does Obama stand on this question being discussed in England and throughout the USA? Would he mandate that Muslim law would be placed above American law or placed in substitute for the Muslims because they have their religious body of law that some claim supercedes our civil laws. mj

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (33341)	7/5/2008 4:52:45 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 224757

what are they gonna say 150 years from now that Obama got all his campaign donations from non americal islamic fascists ??

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (33341)	7/5/2008 4:58:01 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Respond to of 224757

"57" Islamic states in the UN fell more trippingly from Obama's tongue than what he meant to say--Which was that he had visited 47 US states.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (33341)	7/5/2008 8:40:34 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 224757

OBAMA'S TRUSTWORTHINESS WILL SOON BECOME A MAJOR ISSUE FOR THE LEFT SOME DAY SOON, THIS WILL HAPPEN: DAILY KOS ON OBAMA: "THIS IS NOT THE OBAMA I KNEW". AND IT WILL SOONER THAN YOU THINK! BUYER'S REMORSE IS INEVITABLE FOR THE LEFT, AS OBAMA TACKS TO THE CENTER. IT'S ONLY JULY AND HE'S ALREADY FLIP-FLOPPED ON FISA, NAFTA, IRAQ, IRAN, CAMPAIGN FINANCING, THE FLAG-PIN, ABORTION, AND GUN RIGHTS. BECAUSE HE HAS NO RECORD, AND NO EXPERIENCE, THEY HAVE NO REASON TO STAND BY HIM. SO, THEY WILL STAY HOME. SURE: MCCAIN HAS ISSUES WITH THE RIGHT-WING BASE OF THE GOP, BUT WE KNOW WHERE HE STANDS. OBAMA HAS ZERO INTEGRITY, ZERO COURAGE AND ZERO PRINCIPLES. THIS MAKES HIM AN UNKNOWN QUANTITY NOBODY SHOULD TRUST. Permalink - Posted by Reliapundit astuteblogger.blogspot.com