SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (81113)7/7/2008 9:57:13 AM
From: John Carragher  Respond to of 116555
 
that was my point.. you never know what the situation will be, for example. Chavez taking over the industry. major investments were made in that country because it was easier to do business than in the states.. for example build refineries, ship finished or blended fuel for final processing in states and avoid conflicts.. later i know of whole departments in the oil business that were relocated to the country to blend in as part of the nation. oh, no one in the states were offered any of the those positions all were filled from within the country with exception of maybe a top manager or two. Now Chavez has taken over the business.

next the russian agreement to develop Siberia, the fight listening to bloomberg guests and cnbc from england earlier this morning is over the russian investors wanting bp to stop the development in Siberian fields as they are more long term investments paying out over 25 years.. the russian partners prefer going into new locations to drill for faster returns now.



To: elmatador who wrote (81113)7/7/2008 9:57:20 AM
From: Crimson Ghost  Respond to of 116555
 
Given the West supported the looting of Russia during the 1990s by the billionaire oligarchs -- most of them Zionists with close ties to the US and Israel -- Russian anger is entirely understandable.