Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (396563)	7/7/2008 2:41:51 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575864

You said in a prior post that sugar cane was replacing the rainforest. That's a signficant difference from the reality where sugar cane growing is eating away at/invading the rainforest and not replacing it as you suggest. LOL I'm gonna bookmark that post. That is the stupidest thing you've written. When sugar cane growing "eats away at" or "invades" the rain forest, it also replaces the rain forest. Do you not realize trees (maybe you don't realize trees are what the forest consists of) are cut down in order to plant sugar cane? ------------------------------------------------------- I am, of course, not down on Brazil at all. I'm merely pointing out that Brazil's biofuels have an environmental cost that you don't recognize.