Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (396641)	7/7/2008 3:01:02 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573900

Brumar, > Please provide a link supporting that. BTW I know you can't. LOL, even I could "provide a link": wordwiz72.com > Even in the time of the Puritans and the founding fathers of the American Revolution, abortion was accepted prior to "quickening" (feeling fetal movement). To quote Lawrence Tribe, professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard, "In early post-Revolution America, abortion, at least early in pregnancy, was neither prohibited nor uncommon." (Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes, p. 28) He documents with scholarly references to original and secondary research sources the COMMON practice of abortion prior to the mid-1800's when evangelical Protestants, soon followed by Catholics, instituted prohibitions. Damn, this lib s--t is easy! Tenchusatsu

To: Brumar89 who wrote (396641)	7/7/2008 5:28:47 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573900

"Stubborn child laws" were also enacted in Connecticut in 1650...." They must have been anticipating that great american, joe lieberman, or trying to nip the bushes in the bud if you get my drift.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (396641)	7/8/2008 10:00:04 AM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573900

I know you can't Actually you just think I can't. It's beyond my abilities to diagnose your problems, but certainly one of the most glaring is that you are ignorant. You must have quit reading history in high school or something. If I were to speculate, I would say you get by in real life by being physically intimidating when you speak with such certainty while getting the facts wrong. An imposing presence is not effective in written works. Instead even the most bombastic assertion is only a google away from context. TP