Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (28881)	7/8/2008 9:43:09 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

"The house came out with a formulation. The Senate came up with a formulation. The senate won. That doesn't indicate a rejection of the principle of an individual right." Never claimed that. Simply said that the Senate's LANGUAGE is what won out... what made it into the Constitution. "What's interesting is that you never even post the house's version when you try to make arguments based on it." (You are certainly free to look it up if you are interested... but, since it did not make it into the constitution, was rejected after a months-long political battle, that language of the House's is not now national law. However it might be interesting to see how it differed from the language that passed, and WHY the Senate rejected it....)