Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (396817)	7/7/2008 9:33:32 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576894

Again you lie. Where did i say nuke. I didnt say nuke. I was talking about bombing al quaeda targets that couldnt be precision bombing because we dont have real good intel. It would be more like WW2 bombing runs. Maybe B 52s, Please dont say i said nukes again.

To: Alighieri who wrote (396817)	7/7/2008 9:37:29 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576894

"Would I have approved of the dropping of the atom bomb on japan? I dont think so," It was generally believed then that several hundreed thousand american soldiers would have died. Revisionsists have tinkered with the numbers since then but the toll to take the japanese islands would have been high regardless. The better argument would be whether we should have accepted limited surrender, not unconditional. These things are more complex than you make them out to be.