Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (28899)	7/8/2008 6:33:08 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

Re: "If you didn't claim that...." Correct. I didn't. (I don't know enough about constitutional law, have not considered the matter enough in detail, to have formed a personal opinion yet about exactly what those few words 'mean'. Color me: 'still open to argument'.) Re: "And the Senate's language indicates an individual right." If YOU say so.... (But I'd venture to say that --- since the Senate apparently resisted accepting language from the House that unambiguously laid out a personal right, fought against it for MONTHS and finally prevailed in the tussle --- if the Senate's preferred language does establish a personal right to some degree, it seems most definitely to establish such a right to a lesser degree then the House's more direct language would have. <GGG>)