Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (28909)	7/9/2008 5:23:38 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 71588

To: TimF who wrote (28909)	7/9/2008 5:24:29 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Perhaps they fought like cats and dogs over a period of months over the exact wording of this clause (the Senate refusing to accept the House's version, which was written clearly as a right for individuals...) BECAUSE WORDS MEAN NOTHING, eh? The House and the Senate held the entire constitution up for months because... what? They 'just felt like it'? NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL BETWEEN THE TWO FORMULATIONS, RIGHT? LOL! They just fought because they were 'ornery, eh? The two different proposed amendments that they argued over day-after-day were INTERCHANGABLE... is THAT what you are claiming? 'NO difference'? 'Two peas in a pod'? <GGG>