Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (28919)	7/10/2008 12:21:17 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Re: "You mention one aspect of the House version....' ACTUALLY... what I mentioned was that there was a big dust-up between the House and the Senate, with each branch proposing different language. (Presumably if they believed that there was 'no difference' between the different statements that they each came up with, and defended for months of loud debate... there there would have been NO NEED for the months of caterwauling! <GGG>) And... I 'mentioned' that the Senate refused to accept the Houses' language, and --- in the end --- the House decided that they had to accept the Senate's language, else there might not have been an amendment at all. :-) (But... since the language is all the same to you... and it makes no difference, all 'peas in a pod'... I guess you imagine that those Founders must have fought so bitterly for months on end because... what? They liked to hear the sound of their own voices?)