SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (122726)7/10/2008 10:52:56 AM
From: maxncompany  Respond to of 314705
 
I keep saying this. It doesn't seem to stop people from referring to the govt data as if that's the price one would get if they signed a contract today. All one has to do is look at articles and news releases from the 1st half of 2008 and see much higher coal price contracts being signed than govt data suggests.



To: Land Shark who wrote (122726)7/10/2008 10:59:03 AM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 314705
 
- I wouldn't apply the $21/ton price for GXS's resource.

I agree. It could be a lot more. Time will tell.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News