Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (22132)	7/11/2008 2:04:23 PM
From: HPilot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

I don't think he was measuring the radiant heat coming from a cloud. Rather the radiant heat reflected or blocked by the cloud.

To: neolib who wrote (22132)	7/12/2008 1:16:11 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 36921

How stupid your comprehension. Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics. What one measures, when the humidity is low enough from surface to space is emissivities that shows there is no heat being trapped that will warm the earth. What one measures as humidity varies is the change in emissivities of the air above from the thousands and thousands PPM increase and decrease of H20. The lowest clear skies humidity so far has given -89F and the highest clear skies humidity has shown ambient -0F. But even with a million dollar instrument, one cannot measure any change in emissivities of the air for changes of several PPM of CO2. That is because CO2 is hundreds to thousands of PPM less than H20 and H20 absorbs more wavelenghts a much larger spectrum of energy than CO2. All my measurements confirm to me that the analysis of Dr. Gerhard Gerlich and Dr. Ralf D. Tscheuschner so clearly expressed in the Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics Links to the original source of this document in PDF and Tex format is located at The Cornell University Library. arxiv.org is right on science. How idiotic one has to be to suppose CO2 has magic properties the can drive climate temperatures.