Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (398175)	7/12/2008 1:56:56 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 1577020

Broder's a geezer. He never was in the Obama camp.

To: i-node who wrote (398175)	7/13/2008 2:07:06 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1577020

Losing Broder could represent the beginning of the collapse of a house of cards. Huh? What house? What cards? Confused again? Broder is one of your boys. You don't expect him to write nice nice about Obama, do you? "David Broder and Karl Rove David Broder is seen by many as a supporter of George W. Bush political adviser Karl Rove. In a 2003 column, he wrote "I like Karl Rove. In the days when he was operating from Austin, we had many long and rewarding conversations. I have eaten quail at his table and admired the splendid Hill Country landscape from the porch of the historic cabin Karl and his wife Darby found miles away and had carted to its present site on their land." [11] Later, in 2006, he declared that several "publications owe Karl Rove an apology" over their reporting on Karl Rove's alleged role in the leaking of the identity of CIA agent Valerie Plame [12]. He has also been a vocal critic of Congressional hearings concerning the firing of eight US Attorneys in 2007[13], hearings which focused on Rove. Broder's comments about Rove have led some observers to question his impartiality with regard to the George W. Bush administration and Rove in particular. [14] [15] "Six days later, he wrote that the Clintons' marriage presented an "iceberg" to the Democratic party and concluded that "the country must decide whether it is comfortable with such a sharing of the power and authority of the highest office in the land."" [22] en.wikipedia.org