SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (128610)7/13/2008 12:42:20 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
They are trying to get all those new leases before the friendly Bushies leave office..... It's simply a matter of hoarding...scoff up all lease areas before someone else gets a chance..

and that's a problem - hoarding lands they don't intend to explore and pay fees - wow that's bad.

You want to try again on this one??

Go ahead.

You gave a flippant drill drill answer without any thought....try a again and let's see if you can think..


Fact not flippant - there are hundreds of years of oil in the shale deposits even at current consumption rates, but if we turn the fleet in the next 20 years to mostly alternative fuels then we can tap the shale (if needed) for things that require liquid fuels like aircraft.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (128610)7/13/2008 3:43:02 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
That isn't true, but since you don't want offshore drilling and think the oil companies don't want to drill there either, you ought to favor leasing to them. Of course that would require you to mean the lies you spew. And we all know you don't.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News