SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Oral Roberts who wrote (34752)7/15/2008 9:45:16 AM
From: Joe NYC  Respond to of 224741
 
Oral,

I think even the original head of Greenpeace has now admitted that their aversion to Nuclear power was wrong. Basically forced us to build CO2 emitting plants.

I have been saying this for a while. If CO2 does cause global warming, we have the enviros to thank for that.

There will come a tipping point though. Not sure if it's 5 dollar gas or 6 or what, but there will be an energy revolt here somewhere along the line. Why McCain isn't hammering on this issue 24/7 is a mystery to me.

I think some of the enviros are rooting for that. Their pet alternative causes become viable only at very high prices of energy.

Nuclear power, on the other hand, can bring about lower energy prices, once it grows substantially from the current low levels of penetration (~ 20%).

Joe



To: Oral Roberts who wrote (34752)9/8/2008 11:19:53 AM
From: TimF2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224741
 
France heavily subsidized nuclear power. I'm not sure I want to do that.

It seems with energy the government always either subsidizes, or penalizes and restricts, or sometimes both (taking with one hand while giving with the other). If a politician likes some energy solution than he will try to subsidize it, if he doesn't like it he will try to restrict, tax, or heavily regulate it.

How about we just get the government out of the way and have a free market in energy?