Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (22218)	7/16/2008 11:06:47 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Pearly that was one stupid post. But as shown by the numerous examples and examination of historical texts, what you call the green house effect is not the accepted definition of the green house effect. Since you seem not able to comprehend even how terms are defined to make arguments, it is highly unlikely you can ever comprehend the laws of physics and how they are applied with respect to the mechanical insulation of the surface of the earth by the atmosphere. From that it's is quite obvious you have no comprehension of the issue how CO2 has some magic property of insulation that must be hundreds of times it trace concentration to have the climate driving capabilities required to warm the planet by the Al gore, IPCC and not comprehended by pearly definition of the green house effect. As the DOE has said. convenience, in the context of this paper it is called the CO2-greenhouse effect.14 Lee’s 1973 result [109] that the warming phenomenon in a glass house does not compare to the supposed atmospheric greenhouse effect was confirmed in the 1985 report of the United States Department of Energy “Projecting the climatic effects of increasing carbon dioxide” [91]. In this comprehensive pre-IPCC publication MacCracken explicitly states that the terms “greenhouse gas” and “greenhouse effect” are misnomers [91, 142]. A copy of the last paragraph of the corresponding section on page 28 in shown in Figure 15. PIC Figure 15: An excerpt from page 28 of the DOE report (1985).