Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (29101)	7/17/2008 4:47:55 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Re: "Well then he would seem to be ignoring both the law at the time of McCain's birth" Point of information here: WHAT 'law <in existance> at the time of McCain's birth'????????? You have several times obliquely made reference to such a law, but I have no idea WHAT law you are referring to, and I can't recall you ever posting it's name or date. Can't have any comment until/unless I understand what you are referring to. Re: "...and the retroactive law passed about a year later." (Like I said... I know that Congress [not to fail to mention the Executive] sometimes bends or even breaks our laws by actions that they take... but I used to remember from my elementary school days, that our Constitution has a FAIRLY FIRM and DIRECT BAN on ex post facto laws. Whatever happened to our 'highest law', the Constitution of the United States of America? For... if some of it's provisions can be ignored at will, I'd like to see an updated list of 'what parts of the Constitution' are vaporized in this Brave New World now....)