SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Math Junkie who wrote (37064)7/17/2008 6:57:48 PM
From: Elmer Phud  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42834
 
Try the book "The Deniers" by Lawerence Solomon.

Some of the Scientists in the book are the same one who supplied data to the IPCC (with surprising results).

How about this too?

Scientists sign petition denying man-made global warming
By Graham Tibbetts
Last Updated: 5:31PM BST 30/05/2008
More than 31,000 scientists have signed a petition denying that man is responsible for global warming.

The academics, including 9,000 with PhDs, claim that greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane are actually beneficial for the environment.

The petition was created in 1998 by an American physicist, the late Frederick Seitz, in response to the Kyoto Protocol a year earlier.

It urged the US government to reject the treaty and said: "The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind."


telegraph.co.uk

I don't present this as proof of anything but disagreement amongst scientists. The claim that "no responsible scientist disputes that global warming is man made" is simply absurd and brings into question anyone who would make such a bizarre claim. I know you didn't but others have.



To: Math Junkie who wrote (37064)7/17/2008 6:59:25 PM
From: InvesTing  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42834
 
Math, this is the same Carl Sagan that said if we went against Iraq in the first Gulf war that it would end the world as we know it. Saddam would set fire to oil wells in Kuwait and it would result in a nuclear winter doomsday scenario and we'd all die.

Pure hokem as it seems he shifted to others. The problem is that the man made global warming crowd is more politically connected than scientifically sound.