SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (35367)7/18/2008 2:08:38 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Respond to of 224724
 
Is that why he accommodated himself to domestic terrorist, Bill Ayers and Trinity Church's G_d D@mn Rev Wright?

>every stage of his political career has been marked by an eagerness to accommodate himself to existing institutions rather than tear them down or replace them<



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (35367)7/18/2008 3:03:37 PM
From: DizzyG  Respond to of 224724
 
Obama is Just Another Politician

July 18, 2008
By Bruce Walker
Barack Obama is just another politician. That is the increasingly obvious fact of the presidential campaign. He runs to the center to win the election. He breaks his campaign pledge on public financing when it helps him. Obama plans an open air speech in Denver; how is the substance of that speech going to be different than an indoor speech? Everything is for image. Everything is for style. Everything is for political gain.

Has the senator proposed a single really new idea? Has he taken a single really courageous position? If we had learned that Obama walked out of Jeremiah Wright's church, that would have been something -- but, of course, he never raised the slightest peep during his long membership at Trinity. If we had learned that Obama took on the power Daley Machine in Chicago, that would have been something -- but, of course, Obama endorsed Mayor Daley, boss of the longest running political machine in America, for re-election. If we had learned that Obama rejected a single lunacy of the Left -- global warming, constitutional rights for captured terrorists, no drilling in ANWR, anything! -- that would have been something, but, of course, Obama has walked lockstep with every Leftist whim as long as he has been in the public eye. He panders to one group in the Democrat nomination and then panders to another group in the general election. He is just another politician.

Is he an honest politician? Well, he lied about what he had known about Trinity Church in Chicago. He was closely connected with convicted felon, Tony Rezko. Obama is well entrenched in Chicago politics which is owned by Boss Daley. He brings his daughters on a television program and, in less than one day, he "regrets" his decision. He tells San Francisco audiences about rural folks clinging to religion, but then backtracks at once. Can anyone name a presidential nominee who, this early in his career, was caught in more half-truths and outright lies? Can anyone name a politician who became more honest after winning the White House? He is just another politician.

What we do know about his pre-Washington career is not good. As a state legislator, he voted "present" often. Obama "explains" this by pointing out, no doubt correctly, that this was a legislative trick designed to allow the official voting "present" to try to work out a deal behind closed doors -- he assures us that this is an old tradition in Illinois politics. It probably is. But is that what we want in a leader? Is that what we want in our new Messiah? Or does this say something else about Obama? Does it say that he is just another politician?

What we know about the mind of Barack Obama today is not encouraging. There are gaping holes in his basic knowledge of history, government and economics. He said that Arabic was the language of Afghanistan. He said that the United States has 57 states. He said that Canada has a president, instead of a prime minister. He doesn't understand the Joint Chiefs of Staff do not convey his orders to the command structure. But this sort of profound ignorance never affects candidates who appeal to emotion and not to intellect, which is to say, most politicians. And Barack Obama is nothing more than another politician.

Or, perhaps, he is more like another door to door salesman. He charms the housewife, flatters the homeowner, promises what wonderful things his very common products will do, makes his sale, and moves to the next front door. Whether his vacuum cleaner works or his food processor breaks down in a month is not his concern. What matters are his sales figures -- his polls numbers, his votes in primaries or elections, and his electoral victories. He is just another politician.

The irony of all this is that in 2006 many Republicans left their party in disgust, and many other voters joined them, because too many Republicans had become just politicians. Americans in general felt the same way. Congress, the ranch for politicians, has now the lowest rating it has ever had in history -- and that takes some doing! -- yet Americans appeared poised to elect the most typical and ordinary member of that highly unpopular body, a friend of the most corrupt political machine in America, a man who is virtually all glitz, hype and image and has virtually no substance.

So a nation trying desparately to free itself from the manacle of pure, crass, common politics is about to embrace as its Messiah (or, perhaps, in Muslim parts of America, its Prophet), one of the most typical politicians to be nominated to high office in our lifetime. What is in the biography of Obama, besides state legislator? Lawyer! (And his wife is a lawyer too .) Well, that sure separates him from a lot of other cynical politicians in Washington. He might have been a member of the law firm of Clinton, Clinton, Nixon and Obama - a law firm of very political politicians.

Barack is a vast yawn, much more than most presidential candidates in recent memory. Bob Dole was a genuine war hero, as was George H. Bush and as was John Kennedy. John McCain is a man of great courage as a POW. Ronald Reagan made fame and fortune before entering politics. Hubert Humphrey took on Democrat racists in 1948. Eisenhower commanded armies. Even Carter attended the Naval Academy and learned at the knee of Hyman Rickover, a great patriot. Heck, even George McGovern flew a B-17 in the Second World War. Nearly every man who has run for president in the last forty years had something in his biography besides "politician." Everyone, that is, except for Obama. More than any candidate in modern history, Barack Obama is nothing more than another politician.

americanthinker.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (35367)7/18/2008 3:04:33 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224724
 
Why are Dems mad about this, Ken? youtube.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (35367)7/18/2008 3:05:23 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 224724
 
He is anti-establishment and possibly a sociopath.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (35367)7/18/2008 4:43:16 PM
From: Geoff Altman  Respond to of 224724
 
Rather, every stage of his political career has been marked by an eagerness to accommodate himself to existing institutions rather than tear them down or replace them." Lizza continues:

That's precisely why he'd make the crappiest president ever,,,his unbridled love affair with big government.....



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (35367)7/18/2008 4:52:10 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224724
 
Wake up Ken:

Poll Shows Americans Afraid of Obama as Commander-in-Chief

Floyd and Mary Beth Brown
Friday, July 18, 2008

On the night of January 20, 2009, a new commander-in-chief will leave the inaugural podium, parade, and festivities for the Oval Office. A national security staff ready with the latest “threat briefing” will join him there. On his desk, they will place a thick binder of reports, each focusing on real or emerging threats to our national security. In the quiet of the Oval Office -- in the presence of these stern-faced, deadly serious briefers and advisers -- Barack H. Obama, should he be the next president, will come face-to-face with reality.

Americans are afraid of this scenario, Barack H. Obama as commander-in-chief. The New York Times and CBS News released a poll this week; in it, Americans answered detailed questions about this possibility.

The poll’s answers shocked the strategists at the Obama campaign headquarters in Chicago. An intensive international travel schedule for Obama and a refocus of the campaign’s message on defense and foreign policy speaks to this fear.

The poll says Americans consider him lacking in the abilities necessary to run the armed services. Conversely, the polls show John McCain blows Obama out of the water as a good commander-in-chief. Forty-six percent of respondents thought McCain would very likely “be effective” as commander-in-chief, as opposed to only 24 percent saying the same of Obama. In fact, 36 percent think it is “not likely” Obama will be effective in the position.

Obama’s talents lie in his gift of oratory and his ability to move people with emotion, but this does not necessarily make for a good commander. The chief executive’s job requires forward thinking, realistic assessments of the world’s threats, and the maturity to make judgments in a crisis.

The USS Gerald R. Ford, an aircraft carrier, is now under construction in Hampton Roads, Va. It will be ready to join the fleet in 2015, replacing a carrier launched 47 years ago. Do we know that the USS Ford will be needed in 2015?

No, we do not. But can we afford to bet against it?

Obama thinks so. According to his own campaign literature, he is willing to let the USS Ford, and many more of tomorrow’s defense technologies, rust at the pier.

The decision to build the aircraft carrier is based on the concept of preparing America for the next war to come. Commanders must anticipate the evil designs of irrational lunatics. It’s always a tricky business, trying to anticipate future unknowns. Nevertheless, the president’s oath is to protect and defend the United States.

A president who hasn’t had any experience in military strategic planning is going to find himself in deep trouble if he finds his strategic armories empty in the face of an advancing enemy.

A review of Obama’s national defense plans offers insight into his preparedness to meet today’s and tomorrow’s defense realities. Obama makes a variety of claims which we think would dramatically weaken America if enacted. The Obama plans include cutting tens of billions of dollars of the Defense Department budget, and the development of no new weapons in space to protect satellites and strategic assets. He plans cuts in missile defense systems, slowing our development of future combat systems, developing no new nuclear weapons, and negotiating with Russia to take our ICBMs off what he calls “hair-trigger alert”. He advocates deep cuts in our nuclear program.

Not only does Obama have dangerous disarmament plans for America, he sorely lacks in experience. Besides being a junior senator, he has not been on any of the major defense committees. He has no previous hands-on experience with the military nor has he spent time with the men and women of our armed forces.

There are hundreds of weapon systems that could, under the quick-to-cut hand of Obama, be eliminated before they had the chance to prove themselves. If Obama had been in charge when the M1A1 Abrams Main Battle Tank was under development (a huge financial problem for the military) he would have cut it. But its developers persisted, and dollars that might have been considered “waste” by Obama were spent until the M1A1 became the most lethal, most respected, most effective tank on the battlefield.

Ask any Abrams crewmember who has survived direct hits by explosive shells and rocket-propelled grenades if he would have cancelled the Abrams, and the answer will be a resounding “No!”

Obama’s perfect future vision enables him to scrap defense programs, even as our nation’s enemies prepare very nasty projectiles to hurtle across continents and oceans.

Will he be able to effectively deal with crazed terrorists and power-hungry leaders with nuclear weapons in hand? Recent polls show Americans are nervous about Obama as commander-in-chief, and rightly so.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (35367)7/18/2008 6:49:42 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Respond to of 224724
 
Ken,Did you miss these polls?:

Poll Date Sample Obama (D) McCain (R) Spread

Gallup Tracking 07/15 - 07/17 2641 RV 45 44 Obama +1.0

Rasmussen Tracking 07/15 - 07/17 3000 LV 47 46 Obama +1.0