Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (22253)	7/19/2008 12:14:17 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

sorry pearly, you just don't get it. There is no basis in known laws and physical properties of gases with any absorption properties that allow for the trace element CO2, it's total 387 PPM, not just the 80 or so that are suggested to be caused by Humans that will have any actual impact on the global warming of the Planet in other than the trace amount of it's mass vs the mega mass of everything else. Show us your authoritative source for the definition of the "Greenhouse Effect" that is not covered in the dozens of explanations given by G & T and show us the real science of what is defined. Your statement proves you do not know what real science is. You do not comprehend. You just do not get it. Your refutation is simply false. If you do not see how it assumes Conduction and convection are zero. Also it is based upon the 2nd law of thermodynamics being suspended. YOU DO NOT SEE.