Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (22302)	7/19/2008 12:49:18 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Neolib, the problem is you see everyone who disagrees with your GW theories as some kind of crack-pot. The cognitive dissonance you show, by emotionally calling me names such as stupid when I decimate your vapid positions is truly laughable. No, I would be happy to discuss GW with any skeptic who is not a fool or knave. I have not found one. You are far from passing that test. Every single one of the points in that post of yours were stupid, and you should be able to figure them out. That is not my fault. It is 1) the fault of the idiot who wrote it and 2) your fault for posting it here. Was some Gaian holding a gun to your head to make you to something stupid? I doubt it. Why not pick the one you think is the most water tight, and we can look at it? Then when presented with over 35,000 scientists who don't agree with you and the IPCC I encouraged you to look into the Oregon Petition a bit more. How many of those 35K are actually knowledgeable about climate science, how many are actually working climate scientists. You need to look at the various "scientists" and Docs who have signed anti-evolution lists to understand the dynamics of these things. If you have a climate model you believe in, run it out ten years and prove it's validity. Another statement by a fool. Run an FFT on the temp record and try and figure out why this is the statement of a fool.