Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (22319)	7/19/2008 2:19:46 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

you make lies over and over my mis-stating and taking what others have posted out of context. It is not my fault that you blunder all the time. How do I know when it is a blunder vs what you really think? I'll happily excuse any blunders, I make them myself. Where I live and where most humans live, the temperature and humidity are greatly averaged by convection and conduction. You are but an insignificant speck on the earth. The local temp by you has no effect on the earth's net energy balance. When you keep making stupid statements that seem to indicate you don't understand that the earth MUST be in a net radiative balance why would anyone listen to you? I can set up all sorts of local gradients inside my lunar greenhouse as well. Little magnifying glasses to heat this cm2, some little fans here and there to cause little breezes, etc. So what? You keep confusing yourself by pulling in issues to befuddle your seriously challenged old brain. Nobody is arguing that you have to model the details of surface, oceans, and atmosphere to get a reasonable handle on what effect CO2 has on the earth's climate. Yet along you come, and you are no genius, and you seem to really think you have done a better job at developing a physical model than everyone else. LOL! humidity is mostly modulated by conduction and convection. radiation is mostly, 99.9% modulated by humidity. Not in the upper atmosphere. That is where you go wrong. Look at the HITRANS(SP??) data.