To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (22368 ) 7/20/2008 6:37:51 AM From: maceng2 Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36917 What is pointed out is that you cannot parse out the the heat transfer by radiation and then separate it into vectors in some net energy flow. Well I do have deep respect for the many talented German scientists that have blessed science with their efforts. The Swiss only have Pierre Prévost, physicist (1751–1839), and one or two others, plus some chocolate stamped into triangles as claim to fame. It was probably sensible of them to stay out of several European wars as they probably wouldn't have won sporting just those credentials! Pierre Prévost did spend some time serving in the military as many Swiss do.answers.com I see he has the "1791" slot here...Sketching the History of Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics omega.math.albany.edu :8008/cdocs/summer99/history-stat-mech/stat_m~1.htm Pierre Prévosts Theory of Exchanges does pose some amusing thought experiments. ------------------------------------------------------------ In the abstract world of theoretical physics, if a hot body A is put into an evacuated enclosure B , at a lower temperature, then A cools until it reaches the temperature of B . If a body C , cooler then B , is put into B , C warms up till it reaches the temperature of B . It's concluded that radiation falls from B onto C , and therefore also onto A even though A is at the higher temperature. Thus A and C each come into equilibrium at the temperature of B .again, slightly different thought experiment Now let us suppose that that, after it has reached equilibrium with B , one of the bodies, say C , is transferred to a cooler evacuated enclosure D . It loses heat and cools to the temperature of D . Therefore it is radiating heat. But if C , is transferred to a warmer enclosure F then C gains heat and warms up to the temperature of F . i.e. it is absorbing heat . It seems unreasonable that to suppose that C stops radiating when transferred to F ; it is more reasonable to suppose that it goes on radiating but, while cooler then F it absorbs more then it radiates. -------------------------------------------------------------- So yes, one parses several radiation sources into separate components and adds the contributions of each. Perhaps a correction could be considered at the next revision of the paper? Example: 3.9.3 Page 77.tsch.de