Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (400432)	7/21/2008 2:28:53 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 1578452

I'm supposed to re-organize the CIA? Thats how you deal with questions about your super-spy answers that the CIA should infiltrate AQ and stop them before they mount any attacks? You guys are quick to condemn but you have no answers of your own. ------------------------------------------ Okay, Iran was shipping arms in arms and otherwise backing Sadr. What would you have done about it? Complain to Iran and to the UN. ROFL And what would you do when they ignored you Nothing. Sht like that happens all over the world every day. So your final answer to aggression is do "nothing". I thought so. Why not just say that to begin with? ------------------------------------- As for the Iranians, they are limited by what they can do. Any fool who knows the ME and its politics knows that.* And we have some limited ability to impact "what they can do". For example, if our response to any aggression is simply do "nothing", well thats helpful for Iran. --------------------------------------- And btw I respect the sovereignty of other nations even as you all don't. Mostly liberals seem to respect the sovereingnity of our enemies. But not our allies. For example, we're currently in Iraq at the request of the sovereign govt there. But few liberals are willing to acknowledge that fact and even get angry when its pointed out.