Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (124828)	7/23/2008 2:22:01 AM
From: Nevada9999	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313945

Cool map. I never found that in my searches. I hate to disappoint, but the aeromag and gravity probably won't help much at that scale. The magnetics may be influenced by the glacial till to a large extent. The highs could be thicker till with mafic Precambrian fragments from farther north. It depends on the bird height to some extent. Horizontal tabular bodies such as a coal seam do not produce a good anomaly. Vertically oriented objects show up better. I honestly don't know the magnetic characteristics of coal, but suspect it would be low, not high. Nothing jumps out of the bouguer gravity either, but coal would definitely be a low. There are probably very few stations in the area of interest. High resolution gravity might define a 20m coal seam and would be much easier and quicker than seismic. Maybe GXS should look into that instead of whipsawing us with wildcat holes.