Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (22448)	7/24/2008 10:35:29 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

In every field there are those who propose the wrong theory or explamation of the meaning of the laws of physics. The BIO suggests Gilbert N. Plass got it all wrong. If Gilbert N. Plass got it correct there would be a CO2 heating signature and it ain't there. Are the following true. In the three narrow bands of CO2 absorption do only two have any energy content in the black body spectrums of Earth's radiation temperatures. For the two remaining bands do H20 molecules have 20% to 50% of the ability of CO2 to absorb. Common sense probability says in a space where H20 outnumbers CO2 at over a 100 to 1, virtually no energy of the total is absorbed by the CO2. And H20 absorbs all those other bands. The H20 effect it easy to measure. One knows it from common experience. At best 1 part in 10,000 has no effect on the physics of the atmosphere greater than the parts percentage ability to absorb energy.