Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (22515)	7/26/2008 9:36:19 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 36917

Yes those dots connect. But there is no dot for the physics the has an imaginary surface between the earth and space in the atmosphere that is heating the earth by 2Watts or whatever per M^2. Magic CO2 property is built upon the imaginary surface physics and no one can find the Magic CO2 property. The models based upon Magic CO2 properties predict an atmospheric fingerprint that is not observed. The models predicted increased heating raising average global temperatures. But cooling has been found using global satellite monitoring. If you wish to understand if some physicist understands you compare what he says with what I explained above. You point out you do not mention cold, that is amusing. Well dumb. Or in a world of magic CO2 is "A less hot place" not as cold as "A very hot place" Words express ideas, the identical idea can be expressed with opposite words. If you believe you are free to make of the meaning of words that define the laws of physics, you really cannot connect the dots.