Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (402026)	7/26/2008 2:42:32 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575946

"I'm happy to be called an "idiot" by someone who measures "substantial" simply by the tonnage of explosives used." Good. Because you are. "Clinton only had one reason for his "hawkishness" in 1998 and 1999, and that was to make up for a blowjob." Yawn. The spin stays the same. But it doesn't make it any more real. If he really was interested in shoving Blewinsky off the front pages, he would have ordered the boots on the ground that you seem to think was the only "substantial" response available. Because that would have done it. Now the Republicans nearly went ape shit over the response he did give. They probably would have had an aneurysm if he had done that...