Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Metacomet who wrote (136790)	7/26/2008 7:02:46 PM
From: Sea Otter	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 306849

So true. Compare the economic/world situation after Clinton to the one we're going to have under Bush. By any way you want to measure it (budget, inflation, geopolitical peace, governmental competence) Clinton far outperformed Bush. The only way Bush has exceeded Clinton is that Bush (presumably) doesn't have some woman giving him BJs (but see Note below). For some folks I guess that's sufficient reason to prefer another Bush. They're fine with endless wars, the loss of liberties, economic breakdowns, soaring deficits and incompetence on a massive scale. But hey - at least the president isn't getting BJs in the Oval Office! Better to starve to death or sell our souls to the Saudis and Chinese than to have that! <g> Note: of course we don't KNOW that Bush isn't getting BJs. How can we be sure unless there is a governmental investigation? Bush needs to be called before a Senate panel, put under oath, and asked. Only then will we know the true story - and if Condi is involved.