Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: philv who wrote (125604)	7/27/2008 1:02:03 PM
From: Proud Deplorable	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 314108

Yes problem is that the majority of shares represented are held by parties that might accept this deal. In my opinion AUR-X shareholders should get 1 share of Kinloss, not a paltry fraction of a share. No silly out of the money warrant. If I wanted to invest in K.WT I would have done so but its been a loser for many many years and I want my money NOW not IF Kinloss goes up later as Claude suggests it will along with all the other BS in this industry that never happens for the little guy. CRIME OF THE CENTURY financialsense.com I ask again...why waste ones money investing in stocks?