Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kelseysuncle who wrote (79268)	7/28/2008 2:40:56 AM
From: A.J. Mullen	Respond to of 196568

You know the report I mentioned was psuedo-science before reading it? There's an open mind! I'm sorry I don't have the citation. As I said, I posted it when I first mentioned the study - years ago. It was published in a respectable peer-reviewed journal. The study was a double-blind experiment. Neither the subject nor the experimenter knew who was getting zapped. There was a statistically significant difference between those who received the wireless radiation that mimicked that of a cell phone. Statistical tests for such data are well-accepted and non-controversial. Why would you consider them dubious? Ashley