SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Pitera who wrote (9744)7/29/2008 2:30:13 PM
From: John Pitera  Respond to of 33421
 
Merrill Sells $8.55 Billion of Stock, Unloads Money-Losing CDOs

By Bradley Keoun

July 29 (Bloomberg) -- Merrill Lynch & Co., the third- biggest U.S. securities firm, sold $8.55 billion of stock and will liquidate $30.6 billion of bonds at a fifth of their face value to shore up credit ratings imperiled by mortgage losses.

The company sold 380 million shares for $22.50 each, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Merrill closed at $24.33 yesterday and fell $1.21, or 4.9 percent, to $23.12 at 10:04 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading.

Temasek Holdings Pte., the Singapore-owned fund that became Merrill's biggest investor by acquiring shares in December, agreed to buy $3.4 billion of the new stock, Merrill said yesterday in a statement. The New York-based company is paying Temasek $2.5 billion to offset losses on its earlier investment. Merrill will also book $5.7 billion of writedowns in the third quarter.

Almost $19 billion of net losses in the past year forced Chief Executive Officer John Thain to backtrack from assurances that the firm had enough capital to weather the credit crisis. Since taking the post in December, Thain has raised $30 billion in an effort to keep pace with mounting charges on mortgage bonds amassed by his predecessor, Stan O'Neal. Standard & Poor's cut the firm's debt rating last month and signaled that more downgrades were possible.

``It does mark an attempt at curing the problem but at a tremendous cost to existing shareholders,'' said Charles Peabody, an analyst at Portales Partners LLC in New York who recommends selling Merrill shares. ``How can you be pleased by that? It's a necessity.''

Light in the Tunnel

UBS AG analyst Glenn Schorr estimated today that Merrill would report a third-quarter loss of $4.80 a share. Schorr, who has a ``neutral'' rating on Merrill, previously estimated earnings of 72 cents.

The company sold its 20 percent share of Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News, earlier this month for $4.43 billion, 11 percent less than the $5 billion market value Thain placed on the stake in June. He also agreed to sell Financial Data Services, an in-house mutual-fund administrator worth $3.5 billion.

``While third-quarter results and the future capital raise would be yet another burden, we do believe there is light at the end of the tunnel,'' wrote Douglas Sipkin, an analyst at Charlotte-based Wachovia Corp. who has a ``market perform'' rating on Merrill, in a note to clients today.

In yesterday's statement, Merrill said it agreed to sell $30.6 billion of collateralized debt obligations -- the mortgage-related bonds that have caused most of the firm's losses -- for $6.7 billion. The buyer is an affiliate of Lone Star Funds, a Dallas-based investment manager.

`Disheartening'

``Our consistent focus has been to opportunistically reduce risk, and in order to take advantage of this sizeable sale on an accelerated basis, we have decided to further enhance our capital position,'' Thain, 53, said in the statement.

Merrill will provide financing for about 75 percent of the purchase price, according to the statement. The financing is secured only by the assets being sold, meaning Merrill would absorb any losses on the CDOs beyond $1.68 billion.

The sale will result in a third-quarter pretax writedown of $4.4 billion, Merrill said. Less than two weeks ago, the firm announced $3.5 billion of CDO writedowns for the second quarter that ended in June.

Bank of America Corp. analyst Michael Hecht estimated Merrill will report a full-year loss of $11.55 a share and he cut his price target for the stock to $40 from $47, according to a note to clients.

Goldman Trader

``Why these assets are written down when you're selling them and weren't written down in your earnings is a question,'' said Ralph Cole, a senior vice president in research at Ferguson Wellman Capital Management Inc. in Portland, Oregon, which oversees $2.7 billion and doesn't own Merrill shares. ``This kind of announcement is surprising and a little disheartening.''

Thain declined to comment through Merrill spokeswoman Jessica Oppenheim.

Merrill had lost almost 55 percent of its market value this year through yesterday. Only Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. had fallen more on the 11-member Amex Securities Broker/Dealer Index, dropping 77 percent.

Thain, who worked as a mortgage trader during his 25-year career at Goldman Sachs Group Inc., said July 17 that he was ``hopeful'' that Merrill could sell its CDOs, while adding he didn't ``want to do dumb things'' by selling them too cheap.

In yesterday's statement, Thain said, ``the sale of the substantial majority of our CDO positions represents a significant milestone in our risk-reduction efforts.''

Fourth Share Sale

The CDOs Merrill sold to Lone Star were carried on the securities firm's books at about $11.1 billion, indicating they already had been written down to about 36 cents on the dollar. The Lone Star sale values them at about 22 cents.

Merrill said yesterday in a presentation to potential buyers that it would sell as many as 356.5 million shares, a 36 percent increase over the number outstanding at the end of June. The share sale is Merrill's fourth since Thain took over following O'Neal's ouster last October.

Thain raised $6.2 billion in December -- when Temasek bought its initial 9.4 percent stake -- and another $6.6 billion in January. That month, he told investors Merrill had attracted more than it needed. Since then, he has repeated that the firm's capital was sufficient.

``We're very comfortable with our position,'' Thain said on Jan. 30. ``We could have raised substantially more money. We turned people away.''

Three months later he sold $2.55 billion of preferred stock. Then, after Standard & Poor's cut Merrill's credit rating to A from A+ on June 2, Thain announced he was considering a sale of Merrill's stake in Bloomberg.

Temasek Compensation

When the firm reported a $4.65 billion second-quarter net loss on July 17, Thain said the firm's resources were adequate.

``We believe that we are in a very comfortable spot in terms of our capital,'' he said on a conference call with analysts.

In yesterday's statement, Thain said the new capital became necessary because the completion of the Lone Star deal meant additional losses had to be booked.

Merrill was contractually bound to compensate Temasek and other investors who bought shares in the December and January offerings. The stock has since plummeted almost 55 percent. So in addition to the new public offering, Merrill will pay $2.5 billion to Temasek and issue an additional 195 million shares to the other investors, according to yesterday's statement.

XL Hedges

Losses on CDOs and the associated hedging contracts have accounted for about $27 billion of the total $41 billion of total writedowns taken by Merrill over the past year. The firm was one of the largest underwriters of CDOs before the credit crisis hit last year, and Merrill was stuck with more than $50 billion of them on its books when buyers fled the market.

The remaining CDOs may be less worrisome to investors. About $7.2 billion of the $8.8 billion left are hedged with ``highly rated counterparties,'' the firm said in the statement.

In addition to the losses from the Lone Star sale, Merrill said it will record a $500 million loss related to the termination of hedging contracts on CDOs with XL Capital Assurance. It took another $800 million maximum loss related to the potential settlement of hedges with other bond-insurers.

Moody's Investors Service affirmed Merrill's A2 credit rating after the securities firm announced the asset sale.

``We think they have taken care of much of their troublesome exposure in structured finance and real estate,'' said David Hendler, a bank analyst at CreditSights Inc. in New York.

To contact the reporter on this story: Bradley Keoun in New York at bkeoun@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: July 29, 2008 10:12 EDT



To: John Pitera who wrote (9744)7/29/2008 2:42:53 PM
From: nspolar  Respond to of 33421
 
I think the BKX does a major low later this year John, fwiw. Not a lot lower than the last low, but lower. My preferred timing model is mid to end of October, but willing to adjust dependent upon what I see.

The pivot low will take some building and forming, and could even stretch into early '09.

I think in some bank issues the change from raw distribution to accumulation has begun. But the early birds are almost always early by one entire move.

It is still my opinion that the first half of next year could be a real mover, for financial issues. If in fact they do form a pivot low the financial indices will literally rocket up, only to give most back, late next year.

It is possible that over the course of all of next year by my latest doodles we remain stuck in trading ranges ... i.e. the year will be a year for traders (or suckers). If this happens the market may have another test next year. I hope I am not one of the suckers.

There is one big problem imo for the bears, w/r to the NDX for example. It is loitering too long in this area, if in fact the bearish scenario is valid. The proper bearish scenario for the NDX would have it in a C down, and C waves do not loiter around. B or b type waves like to loiter around forever, and confuse everyone.

TF



To: John Pitera who wrote (9744)7/29/2008 3:19:04 PM
From: nspolar  Respond to of 33421
 
Oh ... and by the way .... I am glad to see you are shifting here a tad. Let us try to hit the bottom. It will be worthy hit.

The ability to shift is the mark of a true professional.

There is one Big Bad Bear that I am following intently, that I believe is the best market technician currently alive. No this person does not post on SI, only to clients. He is the consumate professional (imo).

This person is a bear's bear at the moment. I think it may take until well into next year before all this muck in here resolves into a clear (er) picture. And that in itself is one reason I have turned the other cheek and started looking at the other side (both sides hopefully).

In any event I will post if this person changes to the other cheek. I respect him enough that I will worry about my present view, if he does not.

Wavers are their own worst enemies, there is no doubt about it. They think their method is so fool proof, they fool themselves. I know I have been there, more than once. What really happens to cause this is that they get caught up in the psychology and let if affect them and their doodles. I do not know if there is a solution. This is one tough business, no matter how one goes about it.

Almost all the bear wavers I follow have the major indices in a BIG C down. Again, it does not even look like a Big C so far (w/r to Dow, SPX, NDX). Wrong initial structure imo, and it is loitering too much. If you want to gauge a Big C ... look no furthur than this whole move down in the BKX. Tight and wicked. It got right with it.

Well root canal is back on. Oh shit.

TF



To: John Pitera who wrote (9744)7/29/2008 4:29:05 PM
From: ajtj99  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
John, you do realize MER sold their jumk paper for 5-cents on the dollar, right? If they get paid for the entire loan it's 22-cents. If they don't get paid, it's 5-cents and they have to write off the rest.

There are also ratchets in the recent fund raising for MER that amount to a death spiral convertible offering.

I remember when MSTR did a death-spiral convertible in summer 2000 at a reverse-split adjusted $300 range. It didn't stop the stock from tanking to $4.20 by 2002.

I have been looking for a low this fall, so we are in agreement in that respect.

However, after a 6-9 month respite in 2009, we should slide into a test of the 2008 lows and ideally make a slightly lower low in 2010. We should trade in a very narrow range in 2011 and 2012, with the bear not left behind for good until fall 2012 according to my long term models, which have largely been unchanged for the past 18-months.

While the nominal market low may come in 2010, the inflation adjusted real low may be in fall 2012 according to my models.

Check out the Option ARM re-sets coming in 2010 and it may help you see why this is not going to be the low, IMO. 2009 has very few mortgage re-sets compared with 2007, 2008, and 2010, so the environment will be more friendly to the financials.

That comes crashing back to earth in 2010.

Furthermore, while the mortgage situation is in the 4th inning most likely, the commercial real estate problems are in the early stages, and the late inning LBO's are also beginning to blow up.



To: John Pitera who wrote (9744)7/29/2008 4:33:22 PM
From: ajtj99  Respond to of 33421
 
I recall an interview I saw last November when Citicorp was announcing its first round of fund raising and saying this was it. The analyst said in 1988 Citicorp was saying the same thing, and it took another 2-years for the banks to clear everything off their books. He said this would likely be a 2-year process as well.

That would take us into fall 2010, which works with my models.

Note how Citicorp was telling the Saudis in October their losses were behind them and no more were seen in the future.

Denial takes a long time to unwind in the banking business.