Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: queenleah who wrote (37486)	7/31/2008 5:58:34 PM
From: joefromspringfield	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

The Queen ask: "But be that as it may, if true, can you tell me what's wrong with Brinker and his legal reps protecting his work and his reputation and his name by legal and ethical means?" That brings up another question. Why are so many people saying these negative things about Brinker? Why is he being attacked? It isn't just by the people you call bashers but it also included some of his customers. Remember Brinker shut down his own message boards that were limited to subscribers only. Did it ever occur to you that these people might have some legitimate grievances with Brinker?

To: queenleah who wrote (37486)	7/31/2008 6:59:12 PM
From: InvesTing	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 42834

From the rapid recs--less than two minutes, my bet is you have still two aliases here we don't know about Nevertheless the charade is over of you as an honest poster in this discussion. Queen PeanutButter/peanut_butter_luvr you have been CAUGHT and can be rightly viewed as someone who posted under multiple aliases to promote Bob Brinker after righteously denying it. You lied right here on this very thread denying you were posting as Peanut Butter when it was quite clear to be the case from many tells. Indeed you were caught by SI and came up with a cocknbull story that expanded as you chatted with Math Junkie. He being fooled by your BS unknowingly helped you rehabilitate some credibility after being caught with your jockey shorts or panties down whichever of the two genders you claim under your multiple aliases fit. BUT it is way beyond that now. We know for a FACT due to your screw up between your screen names that you lied to SI, you fooled Math and you are trying to fool people into believing your total BS to help Bob Brinker sell newsletters. You said: "I don't have to argue with you about aliases, Ting. That mess you put together in your own way and honey tried unsuccessfully to "clean up" proved nothing" That is not my "mess" Queen multi alias shill, that was YOUR MESS OF YOUR MAKING and you tried to be too clever by half foisting off your various screen names. Here posting as PEanut Butter you said: "To: honeybeerose who wrote (22508) 7/25/2006 3:34:43 PM From: peanut_butter 2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 37489 Honey, to respond to your message 22508: It's too dull and trivial to spend much time on but since I have 5 posts I'll use one. You tell me that you have "said many times that it was a sorry mistake on Brinker's part." Where exactly did you say this "many times." I certainly don't remember you saying it even one time since you started posting here as peanut butter--perhaps I missed these "many times" and you can point me to just one time. I posted on Yahoo as peanut_butter_luvr until the faint-hearted hide-behind-others-IDs copycat imp added an "e" as a final letter to my ID and used it for himself. After that I didn't post much. And I'm not going to get into an extended "alias" dispute with you or cheat/stockalot, rail as you will. I thought this board wasn't supposed to be about personal attacks on other posters." Here you are on Yahoo Utek posting as peanut_butter_luvr and using the "addaletterchangealetter imp" Miss honey I am the original peanut_butter_luvr since 7-22-05 as you can see for yourself from this profile: <br><br>http://profiles.yahoo.com/peanut_butter_...<br><br>The poster who is now posting as mrk_johnsen is pretending to be me and he is the same imp who imped my ID by adding an "e" as a final letter to the end of my exact ID on 10/09/05, and registered and posted as peanut_butter_luvre. <br><br>http://profiles.yahoo.com/peanut_butter_...<br><br>One and the same old addaletterchangealetter sorry-*** imp. <br><br>The old addaletterchangealetter imp and the poster who posts as mrk_johnsen are one and the same, both the same liar who posts fraudulently and deceptively pretending to be and to speak for someone whom he is not. " Very interesting to do a search at Yahoo Utek for "addaletterchangealetter imp" you get a good look at many of this person's IDs. Here you are under post 22556 on this very site claiming your multiple posting game was not possible. "Why do you go on making empty charges you can't possibly support? I don't believe it's possible for one user to have "so many different aliases over here". Please give us some kind of proof of the "many different aliases" you accuse me of, or control yourself, else someone may think you are attacking another poster just for the sake of attacking and harassing." A couple days later you were CAUGHT and both the Queen name and the Peanut Butter name were banished. One can go back and see that to be the case. Then you first claimed on Yahoo UTEK that boohoo you didn't have a clue as to why you were banished. When it was quickly pointed out that you were banished at the same time you other alias "peanut butter" was banished....you began the spin. "A person in another department in the business...BS". Math through good intentions helped build your BS. I mean no disrespect to him because you used him. He took what you were dishing out in good faith. He believed in Brinker and he disliked bashers. You gave him an easy choice to validate you lie to Dave of SI and to those reading your hubris to support Bob Brinker. Total BS from the gitgo. But as all liars do, you screwed up. Above under your pen name "peanut butter" here on SI you claimed in no uncertain terms that you were "peanut_butter_luvr" at Yahoo UTEK. Unfortunately like here where you used the tells like "AAR" that only queen and Peanut Butter and barbot had used on either site at the time; you really screwed up at Yahoo UTEK and replied to Dija who made a remark to "Queen" under your Peanut_butter_luvr alias. The night I asked you about this a couple weeks ago you denied being these two screen names. But you never explained why you posting as peanut_butter_luvr answered Dija beginning your post with Dija's words "NOTE TO QUEEN" and then went on to ask after differing with the premise "Can we still be friends" Why would someone that was NOT QUEEN worry about a disagreement ? Even Dija admits you posted as multiple aliases. He says he doesn't understand why you deny it. He is obviously naive. I have no such problem knowing exactly why you are lying and posting as many aliases. It's a crusade to attack the critics and diminish the effect of critical comments about Brinker. We'll look after while at your comments and Taters and your comments as Queen to diminish the problems of following Brinker. Here was you post as peanut_butter_luvr a male in Sandy Level Virginia replying as QUEEN to a post of Dijas that included "NOTE TO QUEEN". And Peanut butter begins "IT'S" post as an obvious reply and then the "feminine charm" that so sucks in Dija "we can still be friends"---showing that this person (most likely a guy as in all the other likely aliases) thought he was posting as Queen, but unfortunately for the lying shill was using peanut_butter_luvr. "Re: The Gang of Hate 21-Feb-06 10:05 pm dija said to queen "I hate to disagree with you, but this jerk is definitely kirk. Almost everything he writes has "kirk" written all over it." <br><br>No problem, dija, you certainly may be right. And you probably know more about it than I do. (We can still be "friends", right?) <br><br>dija to dupe: <br>--Yah, right. You really relate to others well, don't you? LOL <br><br>In this, we enjoy 100% agreement. :o) <br><br>Your opinion, please, dija. Is he including me in his little gang of "those rejected, jilted, told they were not wanted"? I'm not sure if he is, but if he is, he's wrong again. I have never been rejected at 101 or asked to leave that august body of cree...um...characters. But I have declined to be there of my own free will, uninvited by anyone NOT to be there. <br><br>You're probably thinking I should ask him. You're right again. But I guess I don't really care enough to try to squeeze an honest answer out of him. I'd probably just get him all agitated again. Nobody wants that. :o) peanut_butt... Here was my post at the time you were CAUGHT on SI and before you were caught in a lie that even houdini or Math Junkie or Bob Brinker can lie your way out of . . Re: Queen banished at SI 30-Jul-06 10:55 am :))And each time I opened a queen account, it was banished, until PB was banished too. Now it seems they will let me have the queen account. So far, anyway. But each time they took away the posts I had in." <br><br>til PB was banished too" <br>Here is "her" peanut_butter alias that was banished because of multialias posting ragging on Kirk at SI note sHE refers to "herself" as PB to begin the post. <br><br>To: Kirk who wrote (22574) 7/26/2006 4:14:47 PM <br>From: peanut_butter 4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 22767 <br> <br>kirk said to PB: <br>If you want me to say you did <br><br><br><br>And so we now had Queen spinning like a top. <br>1) Queen alias joins on July 20 peanut_butter alias joins on July 21 <br>2) The two aliases have the exact same modus operandi in touting Brinker and whining about his critics <br>3) In the brief time the mutialiases were posting on SI they both were the only two to ever use the A A R acronym on SI. The same acronymn that Queen singly used in the thousands of posts on this site Yahoo. <br>4) Queen doesn't mention peanut_butter until Math acknowledges how obvious it is--and then wants to shuddup the discussion because the scam is falling apart. <br>5) Queen refers to the alias banned at the same time as PB, just as peanut_butter did in a post to Kirk <br><br><br>Better blame the cops for the bloody gloves and claim that DNA is alchemy Math, you are shilling for the credibility of a LIAR that is caught beyond the shadow of a doubt. Some of us like me and Dave at SI knew you were posting as multiple aliases. You were able to fool Math and you wore Dave down with the BS. Your outting at Yahoo UTEK proves you are just a multi alias shill that played Dave at SI and Math like a fiddle. A total BSer for Brinker just like Taters and quite possibly the same poster. You lie, you lose, feller. Dave at SI knows it. All the lurkers know it. Even Math and Dija know it.