Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (255085)	8/2/2008 1:51:40 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Dan, since you're running away from your original analogy, let me bring it back up in another way. You think Intel can't pay your employer $500K to fire you, but you think AMD can because AMD is not a monopoly. You think Intel can't "bribe" anyone to buy only Intel products, but AMD can "bribe" anyone to buy only AMD products because AMD is not a monopoly. In your world, "bribery" is legal for anyone who isn't a monopoly. And that's the problem with your "bribery" analogy, or any other comparison with real criminal actions, because what Intel is being accused of would not be considered illegal if AMD did likewise. Tenchusatsu