SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (403717)8/1/2008 11:48:48 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1573927
 
NRCC to Republicans: Run against the GOP

Posted August 1st, 2008 at 3:05 pm
newser.com

In April, Minority Leader John Boehner told the House Republican caucus they had nothing to worry about. Republicans knew, he said, precisely how to keep “red” districts in GOP hands — nationalize the races, tie the Dems to Obama and Pelosi.

After Boehner’s strategy failed miserably three times in three months in three reliably-Republican districts, the party has a different strategy in mind.

Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) told GOP congressional hopefuls on Thursday that they should not be afraid to criticize both political parties — including Republican members of the House.

During a conference call, the National Republican Congressional Committee chairman instructed candidates, campaign managers and press secretaries that given the anti-incumbent environment, it could be beneficial for House GOP candidates to distance themselves from politicians they may be serving with next year.

“These [congressional approval] ratings are worse than we had on the eve of losing the majority,” Cole said. “Don’t be afraid to say you are disappointed in fellow Republicans… don’t hesitate to be anti-Washington, D.C.”

And while Republican candidates up and down the ballot flocked to New York four years ago for the last national convention — it’s historically an ideal place to raise a lot of money — the NRCC is also advising Republican candidates this year to skip McCain’s nominating convention in Minneapolis-St. Paul, calling it a “waste of time.”

It looks like the party’s “election anxiety disorder” still needs a little treatment.

On a related note, some of these same Republican leaders have a related plan on how to attack Barack Obama.

Barack Obama returns to Capitol Hill on Tuesday to speak with House Democrats, and Republicans will try to spoil the party by linking the Democrats’ presidential nominee to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and their reluctance to allow votes on offshore oil drilling.

Rep. Adam Putnam (R-Fla.) and Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) will greet Obama’s arrival with a news conference in which they’ll assert that Reid (D-Nev.) and Pelosi (D-Calif.) are holding up votes on offshore drilling in order to protect Obama.

They’ll also begin to use “Pelosi-Reid-Obama” in the all-in-the-same-breath way that Democrats now use “Bush-McCain” — to make the parties’ popular candidates indistinguishable from their less beloved incumbents.

If Dems are lucky, Republicans will actually pursue this. Pelosi and Reid aren’t especially well known, and aren’t particularly unpopular among those who do know them.

When the GOP tried to win congressional races by tying Democratic candidates to Obama, it failed badly. Now they want to win a presidential race by tying Obama to Democratic congressional leaders?

How very odd.



To: i-node who wrote (403717)8/2/2008 12:30:20 AM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1573927
 
Half-Built Subdivisions Are Lonesome Places;

'There's Just No Noise'

By ALEX ROTH

August 2, 2008

BENTONVILLE, Ark. -- Dennis Pflueger and his wife won a rent-free year in a nice new house in an expensive subdivision not far from the headquarters of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. As part of the prize, they then have the option to buy the four-bedroom home for $452,000.

Mr. Pflueger, a telephone-cable installer who describes himself as an "old redneck," is in the middle of his free year. But the Pfluegers are a bit lonely. Just one other family lives in any of the 28 new or unfinished houses on Foxboro Court. Up the street, a sign announcing "Elegant Homes" sits on a lot choked with weeds. The block is as quiet as an old ghost town.

Since real-estate tanked, many new planned communities across the country are half-empty, with for-sale signs outnumbering residents by a large margin.
Across the U.S. the first to move into new subdivisions in recent years find themselves all alone. WSJ's Alex Roth looks at a suburb of Georgia in which new homes sit empty and how the few residents there live isolated existences.

Some of the projects abandoned by bankrupt developers are in places that were hotbeds of new housing construction: Southern California, Atlanta, Las Vegas, Phoenix. As of July, the percentage of vacant housing stock available for sale or rent stood at 4.8% nationally, the highest figure in at least 33 years, according to Zelman & Associates, a real-estate research firm.

more...

online.wsj.com



To: i-node who wrote (403717)8/2/2008 10:42:31 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573927
 
Obama open to drilling
By Wes Allison and Adam Smith, Times Staff Writers

Published Friday, August 1, 2008 10:00 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Long an opponent of offshore drilling, Sen. Barack Obama offered encouraging words Friday for a bipartisan energy plan that would permit oil drilling within 50 miles of Florida's west coast.

The plan, offered Friday by 10 U.S. senators as a way to break the partisan impasse over energy policy that has stalled Congress in recent weeks, would expand drilling but also set new goals and establish new funding for the use of alternative fuels.

In an interview with the St. Petersburg Times and Bay News 9's Political Connections on Friday morning, Obama commended the self-styled "Gang of 10" — five Democrats, five Republicans — for their cooperation and broad plan.

Obama didn't specifically endorse the bill, but his willingness to consider more oil drilling represents a significant change in position. And it dramatically alters prospects for the bill.

Republicans have been pushing for more drilling, but Democrats who control Congress have resisted. If Obama sees this plan as viable, congressional Democrats are likely to fall into line.

"My attitude is that we can find some sort of compromise," Obama told the Times shortly after talking with voters at Gibbs High School. "If it is part of an overarching package, then I am not going to be rigid in preventing an energy package that goes forward that is really thoughtful and is going to really solve the problem."

Sen. Kent Conrad of South Dakota, the leading Democratic negotiator, said he was "delighted to hear Sen. Obama's supportive comments."

At a campaign stop in Panama City, Sen. John McCain, a drilling proponent and Obama's GOP rival for president, didn't directly address the new proposal. He was unaware of Obama's shift and criticized him for having "no plan for addressing the energy challenges that we face."

The New Energy Reform Act of 2008 calls for spending $84-billion over 10 years on research and development of better batteries, fuels and energy-saving technologies and includes tax incentives for people who buy hybrid and alternative-fuel cars and trucks.

Funding would come largely from the royalties energy companies pay the government for the right to drill in federal waters, as well as closing loopholes and repealing tax breaks for oil and gas companies worth some $30-billion.

The bill doesn't address issues that have doomed past compromise attempts. Although the Southeast could be opened for drilling, the plan doesn't mention California, where political opposition remains firm. It doesn't mention drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, another traditional flash point.

Nor would it clamp down on energy speculators, which some experts believe have helped drive rising oil prices. In recent days, congressional Democrats have been trying, unsuccessfully, to pass a bill that would more closely regulate the practice.

"We decided there were certain issues that were not going to get us to 60 votes," said Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, the lead Republican negotiator. "Why should we put something in the package that was going to be a lightning rod?"

But the package does include one lightning rod: Florida.

Under the proposal, drilling for oil and natural gas would be permitted as close as 50 miles from Florida's west coast, which is currently protected by a 2006 ban on drilling within about 230 miles of Tampa Bay and 125 miles from the Panhandle.

Florida's east coast would be exempt. Drilling also would be allowed 50 miles off the coasts of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia if their legislatures opt to allow it.

Florida would have no say in the matter, however, because Senate advocates believe the eastern Gulf of Mexico offers the best chance to get more oil and natural gas to market quickly.

In return, Florida would get up to 37.5 percent of the royalties energy companies pay for drilling rights as far as 200 miles into the gulf. Eventually, that could be worth millions of dollars per year, senators said.

In Florida, political opposition to drilling has softened as gas prices continue to rise, and a Quinnipiac University poll released this week found that 60 percent of Floridians favor more offshore drilling.

However, support among Florida's elected officials has typically been predicated on giving the state Legislature final approval.

"Unfortunately, the proposal would eliminate Florida's 2006 gulf protections and give Floridians absolutely no voice in determining where exploration could occur," Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., said Friday.

Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., told Senate Democratic leaders that any attempt to open the west coast to drilling would be met with a fight. Nelson said he will be working to educate Obama on the repercussions of drilling 50 miles off the coast.

"Fifty miles off the coast would cut the heart and the lungs out of the United States military, because the largest testing and training area for the Department of Defense in the world is the Gulf of Mexico off of Florida. ... That's something he needs to know."

A U.S. Energy Department study has found it will take years before gas and oil from the eastern gulf would come online, and the impact on prices would likely be negligible.

In Friday's interview, Obama reiterated his belief that "we are not going to drill our way out of this problem. ... We have 3 percent of the world's oil reserves; we use 25 percent of the world's oil."

Still, Obama's positive reaction to the plan is marked a shift from his previous statements. In June, Obama sought to distinguish himself from McCain, who had just called for lifting the 25-year-old federal moratorium on offshore drilling.

"And when I am president, I will keep the moratorium in place and prevent oil companies from drilling off Florida's coasts," Obama told reporters in Chicago then.

Times staff writers Alex Leary in Panama City and Robert Farley in St. Petersburg contributed to this report. Adam Smith reported from the Obama campaign in Florida. Wes Allison reported from Washington. He can be reached at allison@sptimes.com or (202) 463-0577.

obama in st. petersburg: Sen. Barack Obama calls for a new round of $1,000 rebate checks to jump-start the economy, but his message of hope to a crowd of 1,000 is nearly eclipsed by hecklers. Tampa Bay, 1B

• To see video and a photo gallery of Obama at Gibbs High School, go to politics.tampabay.com.

MCcain in panhandle: In Panama City, Sen. John McCain defends a TV ad that describes his Democratic opponent as a superficial celebrity and says he has not violated his pledge to run a respectful campaign. He attracts a crowd of about 1,000. Tampa Bay, 1B

>>fast facts

Listen for yourself

To see the entire interview with Sen. Barack Obama, tune into Political Connections on Bay News 9, Sunday at 11 a.m.

What it contains

Here are some key provisions of the New Energy Reform Act of 2008, which a bipartisan group of U.S. senators announced Friday.

• Allows oil and gas exploration as close as 50 miles to Florida's west coast.

• South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia and Georgia could opt to allow drilling as close as 50 miles to their shores.

• Provides $84-billion over 10 years for research and development of alternative fuels, alternative fuel vehicles and better batteries, as well as tax incentives and conservation programs.

• Provides $7.5-billion to help U.S. automakers retool for new technologies.

• Provides a $2,500 tax credit for consumers who buy hybrid or highly efficient vehicles, or who retrofit existing vehicles with alternative-fuel engines.

• Repeals tax breaks and incentives to oil companies to help pay for the plan.

© 2008 • All Rights Reserved • St. Petersburg Times



To: i-node who wrote (403717)8/2/2008 12:04:57 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573927
 
Democrats: Congress overcoming GOP neglect

By WILL LESTER – 44 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Democratic-controlled Congress is working to overcome years of neglect by the Bush administration of agencies intended to safeguard the health of the public, especially children, a leading Democrat said Saturday.

Rep. Henry Waxman said in his party's weekly radio address that Congress is "giving the next administration the tools it will need to start putting public health — and especially the health of our children — first."

Congress took action this week to protect the health of children, strengthening rules for the Consumer Product Safety Commission concerning toy safety and restricting marketplace practices used by the tobacco industry to target children.

The California Democrat called "it was a very good week for the American public."

Alex Conant, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, said: "It's stunning Democrats would claim to have a great week after failing to vote on let alone pass an energy plan. On the No. 1 issue facing most Americans — gas prices — the Democrats in Congress have failed to deliver any relief."

The Senate on Thursday passed and sent to the White House legislation that bans lead from children's toys and seeks to ensure that chemicals posing possible health problems will not end up on toys and articles that kids chew on and play with. The Senate voted 89-3 for the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act after the House passed the bill Wednesday by 424-1.

"The safety commission failed to protect children against dangerous levels of lead in toys, and it did nothing to stop the use of dangerous chemicals in plastic toys," Waxman said in explaining the need for legislation to strengthen the CPSC.

In the other action Waxman referred to, the House on Wednesday overwhelmingly passed legislation that for the first time would subject the tobacco industry to regulation by federal health authorities charged with promoting public well-being.

The bill would further tighten restrictions on tobacco advertising and impose new federal penalties for selling to minors. But its most far-reaching provisions would give the Food and Drug Administration the power to regulate tobacco, from cigarettes to new kinds of smokeless products.

Public health advocates supporting the bill say regulation will slowly but surely put pressure on the industry, reducing the overall number of smokers and the harm that is caused by tobacco use.

It was unclear whether the Senate will have time to act on the tobacco measure and the Bush administration issued a veto threat this week.

ap.google.com



To: i-node who wrote (403717)8/2/2008 12:06:47 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573927
 
Analysis: Democrats exact price from Bush for war

By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS – 2 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — They did not end the Iraq war or tackle $4-a-gallon gas. But the Democratic-run Congress created programs this year to educate veterans and feed and house the poor. Democrats also cuts deals with a weakened GOP president to send voters some economic help.

Their election-year strategy was to exact a steep price from President Bush for letting him have his way in some fights, while teaming with Republicans — some nervous about re-election — to defy him on other fronts.

The time for bargains is all but over.

When Congress returns in September from its five-week break, a few routine chores will dominate the agenda: renewing some tax breaks and passing a bill to keep agencies on automatic pilot until there's a new president. A second economic aid bill is a possibility; more partisan wrangling over what to do about gas prices a certainty.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., called Congress' failure to bring troops home from Iraq "probably my biggest disappointment" of the year.

Bush won $162 billion in war money — without any restrictions — well into 2009; his term ends in January. He also got expanded powers for intelligence agencies to eavesdrop, without warrants, on suspected terrorists.

Still, Pelosi said, with the help of Republican defectors and fierce negotiating with Bush, "we did find some areas where, although he initially resisted, he came around."

That was true of an economic relief measure developed quickly by Pelosi, House Republican leader John A. Boehner of Ohio and Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson that sent rebates of $600 to $1,200 to most wage-earners. The checks are widely credited for having a positive effect on the economy.

The $168 billion in economic aid was in essence a tax cut that omitted many of Democrats' highest priorities, including jobless benefits and heating and food aid for the poor. But it did fulfill the Democrats' goal of sending checks to low-income people.

When it came time to pass Bush's war spending measure, Democrats insisted on the jobless aid, plus a $63 billion, 10-year GI Bill, more than doubling the college aid for troops and veterans.

"It was a classic strategy of giving the president things he doesn't want in bills he has to have," said George C. Edwards III, a Texas A & M University political scientist.

Bush also strongly resisted Democrats' foreclosure rescue plan, calling it a burdensome bailout. But with foreclosures soaring and markets terrified about the financial health of the big mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, he relented in exchange for the power to rescue them and tighten oversight.

The resulting compromise is projected to help 400,000 homeowners avoid foreclosures beginning on Oct. 1. In the bargain, Bush had to swallow some $4 billion in grants for devastated neighborhoods and a new affordable housing fund financed by the companies, which Democrats long had sought.

"We were able to get some things done," Pelosi said.

Bush showed that even an unpopular, lame-duck president still has sway on national security issues, plus the negotiating leverage that comes with the power to veto legislation.

"In the eighth year of the presidency and in this environment, Bush's veto was pretty strong," said Candi Wolff, his former top legislative aide.

But this year, more than in the past, his accomplishments came with heavy measures of concessions.

"He had to compromise, and he had to do it in two ways: either they negotiated out a compromise or he was pushed into a compromise politically because of where the votes were," Wolff said.

The prospect of losing veto showdowns with Bush limited the Democrats' ability to win as much domestic spending as they wanted and stopped them from restricting his ability to wage war or spy on suspected terrorists.

Partisan gridlock over energy blocked any relief on gas prices. Renewing Bush's No Child Left Behind education law fell victim to disputes over money and flexibility.

Bush's veto fell flat in a couple of instances when Republicans in Congress instead sided with Democrats.

An election-year farm bill featuring a $10 billion boost in nutrition programs such as food stamps was enacted over the president's veto.

More surprising to the White House, many Republicans also sided with Democrats on protecting doctors from Medicare fee cuts by instead reducing spending on private health plans that serve the elderly and disabled. They abandoned Bush and joined Democrats to override his veto of that.

"Who would be afraid of him?" Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.

Democrats, however, did join with Bush this summer on one of his initiatives. He wanted to double U.S. aid for fighting AIDS in Africa and other poor countries. Democrats instead tripled it, to $48 billion over five years. Bush went along.

They also forged a deal on a top Democratic goal, new rules to ban lead in toys.

"The president doesn't get involved much with what goes on around here," Reid said. "Once he does, we're able to accomplish a lot."

For now, Bush is not even going near the idea of another economic aid package. "Talking about a second stimulus package right now is premature," said Dana Perino, the White House press secretary.

Democrats plan to advance a bill this fall that could include more public works spending, doubling home heating and air-conditioning subsides for the poor, increasing food stamps, and providing more aid to states.

Lawmakers left for their summer vacation stalemated over energy, particularly on Republicans' desire to open the Atlantic and Pacific coasts to oil drilling. It is certain to crop up again — probably repeatedly — when they return.

They also are expected to pass a measure that has become an annual fixture to prevent millions of families from being hit with the Alternative Minimum Tax, at an average cost of $2,000 to $2,500.

Congress is under pressure, too, to extend expiring tax breaks mainly to solar, wind, other renewable energy developers, but also for teachers and families.

Before they scatter for the elections, lawmakers also have to cut a deal to keep the government running — probably into 2009. Republicans have pledged to make their stand on offshore drilling there, but they have little appetite for being blamed for a government shutdown. So some sort of compromise is all but assured.

The "fights that await our return won't be easy," Reid said Friday. "We'll fight if we must, but we'd much rather dance."

ap.google.com