SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fastpathguru who wrote (255086)8/2/2008 1:06:24 AM
From: Elmer PhudRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Now I need to talk to a CPA to find the definition of a basic English word?

Yes, that's about it. You may not know the difference but Intel does.

Now why don't you stop wasting the boards time with petty hair splitting?



To: fastpathguru who wrote (255086)8/2/2008 1:44:17 PM
From: graphicsguruRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
A contractor is an employee.

Lay off fpg. In ordinary business parlance, people distinguish
carefully between "employees" and "contractors." Employees
are paid directly by the company, so the company is required
by law to pay them benefits. Contractors, by contrast, are
regarded as "self-employed," so they are still paid for the work,
but need to fend for themselves as far as benefits. The IRS has
a list of criteria that companies can use to distinguish contractors
from employees.

When AMD hires a law firm to sue Intel, the individuals who work
for that law firm may end up spending full time doing work on
AMD's behalf, effectively paid by AMD, but they are not AMD
employees. They are employees of the law firm. If the law firm
happens to employ only a single person, the situation is the same.

If you hire someone to clean your house, then the person may or
may not be your personal employee. One of the tests is whether or
not they use their own tools (vacuum cleaner for example). In one case,
you're supposed to pay matching social security taxes, and in the other
it's their responsibility.



To: fastpathguru who wrote (255086)8/2/2008 2:05:14 PM
From: setiRespond to of 275872
 

Did you consider yourself to be "unemployed" for 25 years while you "worked" for Intel?


It's a concept called self-employed, or employed by the firm Intel was contracting with.

It's a simple enough concept. You might take some time trying to understand it instead of posting endlessly nauseating "expert" opinions of anti-trust and EU law.