SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (138639)8/2/2008 1:14:23 PM
From: Jim McMannisRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
If Obama was really that concerned he's send the windfall tax to GM. g



To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (138639)8/2/2008 1:22:21 PM
From: Smiling BobRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
Obama's goal is to have little or no need for oil companies ASAP.
That would be best.

Had we followed through with energy plans of 30 years ago rather than laugh at the peanut farmer and abandon them, that would be the case.

Farmers are the most frugal of all. Lots of lessons to be learned. They know like no other other what it's like to conserve and save for tough times.



To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (138639)8/2/2008 1:22:38 PM
From: James HuttonRespond to of 306849
 
As long as we're doing windfall profits taxes, how about one on farmers, or make them give back the subsidies. Well hell, let's just add an amendment to the constitution outlawing the business cycle. Anyone making money must give their profits to those that are not. The amendment must also require that all citizens change human nature so that they will continue to work knowing they will have to give up all profits.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News