Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (403834)	8/2/2008 6:34:05 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1575214

"There is zero evidence for that at all." Z, how naive can you be? When is evidence required for a good smear? It takes all the fun out of it. Just ignore the fact he has visited wounded troops before without cameras. And, ignore the fact that he had sent his staffers home before the military informed him that he couldn't take his campaign staffers with him. In addition, ignore the fact that senators, much less ones running for president, only go somewhere without staffers when they decide to do a little toe-tapping...

To: SilentZ who wrote (403834)	8/2/2008 7:10:47 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575214

Now that we've returned to the beginning, why do you think Obama chose not to visit wounded American troops after a visit was already scheduled? And yes, I've already read the different revisions of the same spin why Obama chose not to go. What do you think of Obama and the other two senators snubbing wounded American soldiers? Obama has no leadership qualities, reinforced by snubbing men and women who have sacrificed their lives for all of us. Odd how the latest Obama campaign press release is saying Obama didn't go because it might be viewed as a campaign event, yet we are to believe his stop in Berlin and the other stops in the middle east were not a "campaign event".