Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (82633)	8/3/2008 4:39:43 AM
From: NOW	Respond to of 116555

you really shouldnt comment then

To: Dan3 who wrote (82633)	8/3/2008 11:19:03 PM
From: Webster Groves	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

You are certainly entitled to comment and have an opinion. Don't let the "experts" be the clergy of science. What MIT did was enhance the production of oxygen from electrolysis. The Co-P catalyst in pH neutral water does a job just as well as caustic solutions previously required. That is the key. You still need an energy source - that's solar photovoltaic as mentioned in the article, Another related catalytic reaction produces H2 , so together you have a storable fuel source produced by solar energy (via intermediates). The importance is scalability. A good process that requires Pt is not scalable to industrial production, whereas Co-P is. I think they are doing a great job at MIT. Imagine if they were funded at a level 1% of what big oil pays lobbyists to stall alternative energy. wg PS - I'm long Canadian producers.

To: Dan3 who wrote (82633)	8/4/2008 2:50:50 AM
From: NOW	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 116555

Karsten Meyer, a professor of chemistry at Friedrich Alexander University, in Germany, calls it "probably the most important single discovery of the century." Your ignorance about the potential of this discovery is almost as amazing...