SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (404233)8/4/2008 5:40:54 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574657
 
"The key fallacy behind the "peak oil" argument is that there's nothing we can do to exceed the peak production of 1972, so why bother?"

No, it doesn't. However, it does mean that you need to take that into account and start looking elsewhere. That is, assuming you want to be reality based. If you dream of new super-continents of unexplored and untapped resources, then ignoring the peak(s) and saying we just need to drill more might be your cup of tea...



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (404233)8/4/2008 5:42:34 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574657
 
"The key fallacy behind the "peak oil" argument is that there's nothing we can do to exceed the peak production of 1972, so why bother?"

There is nothing we can do to exceed the peak of 72....if you know something you better tell Big Oil in a hurry...cause they know the peak was reached... BTW, the world peak appears to have occured or is about to occur soon....

Sure we should continue to drill and look but get over the silly assumption that there is an unlimited supply and all we have to do is find it......you know of course that we're getting ready to explore under the North Pole...not exactly Texas, is it??
And 22,000 foot wells in the ocean is not like drilling a 100 feet in the sand of Saudi Arabia.... So uncross your fingers and spend a lot of time on the Dept of Energy web site...