Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (114897)	8/6/2008 9:58:44 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

It sounds like she was a voice in the wilderness. Keep ignoring the shark in the lagoon and it may go away. That's the attitude of the other analysts.

To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (114897)	8/9/2008 12:18:47 PM
From: Knighty Tin	Respond to of 132070

Any prediction in particular? I agree that there will be more shotgun weddings, but most of them will produce "Deliverance" children. The Fed will probably exclude the banks from having to reveal the real state of their insolvency, as it wouldn't be good for the financial system and it would hurt future employment opportunities for Fed VPs. I love the sour grapes from the analysts who missed the boat. However, they are right about her fame fading. At some point she has to turn optimistic and that will be a very tough call. And then she will probably lose her job. Anyone remember Elaine Garzarelli? She got the crash of '87 right and was fired soon thereafter. I disagree with the Abby Jo comparison. When she says something, it is still very prominent because of where she works and the fact that Goldilocks backs her, bigtime.