SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (405087)8/7/2008 8:10:03 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571405
 

IT'S THE FUCKING NATIONAL ENQUIRER! HAVE YOU PEOPLE LOST YOUR MINDS?


But why is Edwards, a noted trial attorney, not protesting at all? In fact, he appears to be in hiding.

I'm sorry if the guy's life got destroyed. So did Bob Packwood's and Wilbur Mills'. That's life in politics.



To: SilentZ who wrote (405087)8/7/2008 8:15:13 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1571405
 
Interestingly the National Enquirer has been very early and accurate on stuff like this. Started with the OJ trial.

Edwards might really be sweating it.



To: SilentZ who wrote (405087)8/7/2008 8:23:05 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571405
 
"HAVE YOU PEOPLE LOST YOUR MINDS?"

Is this a trick question?

As I have pointed out, go to the snopes site and look under 'political'. Most of the wingnut stuff is smears and almost none of it can be backed up. Now, some of it is impossible to verify, but much of it is pretty easy to disprove. They are willing to make up almost anything in the hope the smear will stick.

It's what they do. They don't see anything wrong with it. Like when that Photoshopped picture of Kerry and Jane Fonda was tracked back to the Freepers. They were angry that it didn't have a longer run.

They deal in lies.

It is what they do.



To: SilentZ who wrote (405087)8/7/2008 8:28:06 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571405
 
Did you know a security guard who escorted Edwards from the hotel has identified Edwards?

Why isn't Edwards fighting back given that his shot at VP or AG is being destroyed? If the Enquirer is running a photoshopped picture, he has a great case. He certainly knows how to sue people.

Btw did you know the National Enquirer was the first to break the story of Jesse Jackson's love-child?

I like that the MSM is spiking the story and liberals are so vehemently denying it. Deny, deny, deny!

By last night even Mr Edwards’ biggest supporters were demanding he come clean with the public, as well as his wife of 30 years and their three children.

'If it’s not true, he has to issue a stronger denial. It’s very damaging,' said Gary Pearce, who ran Mr Edwards 1998 senate campaign.

'He’s got to stand up and say, ‘This is not my child and I’m going to take legal action against the people who are spreading these lies.’ It’s not enough to say it’s tabloid trash.'

Former Democratic National Committee chairman Don Fowler said Mr Edwards’ political standing was slipping by the day because he refused to address the story.

'If there is not an explanation that’s satisfactory, acceptable and meets high moral standards, the answer is no, he would not be a prime candidate to make a major address at the convention,' Mr Fowler added.

dailymail.co.uk


John Edwards under growing pressure to confront tabloid reports of love child
By MARK JOHNSON

McClatchy Newspapers

RALEIGH, N.C. — Former Sen. John Edwards has a deadline to save his spot on the national stage.

With two weeks to go before their national convention, a number of Democrats are saying that Edwards needs to publicly address National Enquirer stories that have alleged he had an affair with a campaign worker and fathered her baby.

The Enquirer released photos Wednesday purportedly showing Edwards and the baby.

If Edwards fails to clear up the story in short order, he risks party officials deciding not to have him speak</b. or, if they do, creating a distraction from a week focused on Barack Obama accepting the nomination.

“If there is not an explanation that’s satisfactory, acceptable and meets high moral standards, the answer is ’no,’ he would not be a prime candidate to make a major address to the convention,” said Don Fowler, a former Democratic National Committee chair.

Democrats gather in Denver on Aug. 25 and Edwards, as the 2004 vice presidential nominee and a presidential candidate who won delegates this year, ordinarily would be locked in as a speaker.

“He absolutely does have to (resolve it). If it’s not true, he has to issue a stronger denial,” said Gary Pearce, the Democratic strategist who ran Edwards’ 1998 Senate race. “It’s a very damaging thing. ...

“The big media has tried to be responsible and handle this with kid gloves, but it’s clearly getting ready to bust out. If it’s not true, he’s got to stand up and say, ’This is not true. That is not my child and I’m going to take legal action against the people who are spreading these lies.’ It’s not enough to say, ’That’s tabloid trash,’“ Pearce said.


Edwards is widely regarded as a rousing speaker, particularly on poverty, and still has as many as 19 delegates pledged to him, making him a logical choice for a high-profile convention role under normal circumstances.

Convention organizers said Wednesday that the schedule of speakers has not yet been announced.

Edwards’ political currency declines with each day the story goes unresolved, Fowler and other Democratic strategists said.

An appearance at the convention would only highlight the unresolved story, said Chris Lehane, a Democratic consultant and former aide to then-Vice President Al Gore. A convention speaking appearance could become the moment that drives news media coverage of the alleged affair to explode.

“You want to address these issues long before you get to that point,” Lehane said. “Otherwise people who haven’t written about it before, now start writing about it.”

Edwards’ decision not to take questions about the alleged affair has allowed doubts to linger and political bloggers to speculate. The National Enquirer has reported that he fathered a child with a former campaign worker and met with her in a Beverly Hills hotel last month. He made no response to the National Enquirer’s posting of its photos Wednesday.

Two weeks ago, after the National Enquirer ran the story about the hotel liaison, he dismissed a reporter’s question in Houston and used the “tabloid trash” line.

He brushed off a Charlotte Observer reporter in Washington last week: “Can’t do it now, I’m sorry.”

His designated staffer for press contacts has not responded to e-mail requests for an interview.

No one answered a reporter who rang a buzzer at the gate of Edwards’ Orange County home on Wednesday.

Friends and former staffers refuse to comment now, though they helped Edwards last fall by dismissing an October story in the Enquirer of a sexual relationship between Edwards and a campaign videographer when it initially broke.

“Sorry cannot help you on this one,” wrote Jennifer Palmieri, a former top Edwards aide, in an e-mail Wednesday.

The Enquirer’s October story, citing unnamed sources, claimed that Edwards was having an affair with a woman who had filmed a series of videos during his presidential campaign. The tabloid later reported that she was pregnant.

Two weeks ago, the tabloid posted a story online chronicling how Edwards had visited the woman, Rielle Hunter, and their child on July 21 at a Beverly Hills hotel and that the paper’s reporters confronted him afterward.

Hunter posted an online statement at the time denying the October story. In December, a campaign worker for Edwards, Andrew Young, claimed paternity of the woman’s then-unborn child.

Last week, though, the Charlotte Observer obtained a copy of the child’s birth certificate, which did not list the father. Hunter’s lawyer would say only that “a lot of women do that” and that it was a personal matter between Hunter and Young.

Presidential candidates who lose in the primaries traditionally are invited to address their party’s convention. Politico reported last month that Edwards told others he was promised a prime time speaking slot when he endorsed Obama.


primebuzz.kcstar.com


dallasnews.com



To: SilentZ who wrote (405087)8/9/2008 3:10:45 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1571405
 
Z, > IT'S THE FUCKING NATIONAL ENQUIRER! HAVE YOU PEOPLE LOST YOUR MINDS?

I'm waiting for you to take the next step:

"IT'S A F------ PRIVATE FAMILY MATTER! HAVE YOU PEOPLE LOST YOUR MINDS?"

Ted is already there, by the way, LOL ...

Still think the mainstream media wasn't actively trying to cover up this story?

Tenchusatsu