Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (1351)	8/8/2008 4:20:05 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86355

Off the coast of CA???? In some places, that doesn't necessarily mean of the coast of CA, nor does it necessarily exclude CA. If the lease was canceled by new policy/regulation/law, either directly, or effectively by not letting the companies extract oil from where there is a lease, than compensation might have to have been provided, but if that's the case it could have been. I don't have solid evidence that this is the case, I'm only saying 1 - It could be true and 2 - The statement you quote doesn't in any way imply that it isn't true, or even that its unlikely. You might have other evidence for it not being true, but your put across your post as if was definitive and it wasn't anywhere close.