SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (38131)8/9/2008 6:11:19 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 218027
 
Greenspan & PIMCO: A Gross Conflict of Interest

By: Wall Street Weather Friday, August 08, 2008 12:45 PM
Sectors: Finance
Symbols: FNM, FRE Email Comments (0) Bookmark It

Former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan was on CNBC last week, ranting about Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE):

“I think the solution here ultimately is going to be ultimately, a nationalization of both Fannie and Freddie. And I hope a restructuring in nationalization more capital coming from taxpayer money. And then split them up into five or ten separate entities and sell them back in the market.”

Appearing with Greenspan on the “Closing Bell” show was PIMCO’s Managing Director and portfolio manager Paul McCulley. PIMCO, the world’s largest bond fund manager, hired Greenspan in May 2007 as a consultant. Yet at no time during the interview did Maria Bartiromo ask Greenspan and McCulley to disclose this relationship and how nationalizing the GSEs would result in a windfall profit for PIMCO.

ELMAT: A windfall profit for Allianz, the onwer of PIMCO, mind you!

If the GSEs are nationalized, the spread between Treasuries and the Fannie and Freddie debt will be compressed. The GSEs interest rate costs will go down as their debt would be seen as almost equal to Treasuries. Bond values are inversely correlated to interest rates. Treasury interest rates would rise and their values would decline due to the added equivalent supply. Correspondingly, the outstanding GSE debt will show sharp capital gains, so PIMCO will see a large benefit as they are a big holder of GSE debt. Besides PIMCO, banks would also benefit from GSE nationalization. Banks are also large holders of GSE debt as the debt can partially count toward a bank’s capital requirements. Banks are holding over 50% of the GSEs $5 trillion debt.

Greenspan, PIMCO and the banks should be careful what they wish for. GSE nationalization would cause investors to be wary of purchasing equity in any US financial institution. This would raise the cost of new capital to all financial institutions, regardless of their condition. Banks would have to reduce their balance sheets and contract lending. The fallout would be higher interest rates for both businesses and consumers.

Basically, Greenspan/PIMCO would like the government to do a hostile takeover LBO of Fannie and Freddie so PIMCO could benefit at the expense of shareholders and US taxpayers. Then the investment banks would immediately work on creating IPOs for Greenspan’s “five or ten separate entities.” The IPOs will fail to attract subscribers because if the government takes over a financial institution once, who’s to say they wouldn’t do it again? GSE nationalization is a one-time “total return” for Bill Gross and PIMCO.



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (38131)8/9/2008 6:45:45 PM
From: maceng2  Respond to of 218027
 
I hold no favorable view of Russia, and as a UK citizen, I will have to buy my energy supplies from there soon.

I think it's important to look beyond just the obvious propaganda news. I would hope our leaders don't just act like bozos when it comes to negotiating with the Russians.

The Russians can play the separatist card as well as anyone. If it's good enough for Kosovo, it's good enough for South Ossetia too.

nytimes.com

and as far as average lifespan is concerned, I wonder how the figures in Iraq look today?

Some UK news on the situation.

ananova.com