Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (38497)	8/12/2008 1:02:27 AM
From: Archie Meeties	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218070

I notice that carranza's response to the post your linked is exactly the same as mine. You're interesting to read as long as you don't insult and demean. Otherwise, I can just pick up the onion. theonion.com In any case, the burden of proof is always on the accuser, not the accused, and so your inability to cite his post just means to me that he didn't say that. But I'll ask him and get back to you. And then, matter over, move on to something greener, golder, dealers choice. The other interesting part of your post... "BTW, Maurice, about gold and QCOM, you remain wrong" The tides have turned and in fact, Maurice was right, QCOM is outperforming gold. finance.yahoo.com Also, then there's this little company, about to go public, revolutionary, that QCOM has an 8% stake in. Here's where to begin the search...Yet-Ming Chiang. Everything comes back full circle sometimes, maybe everytime.